Latest Teleradiology and The Indian Compensation Conundrum Here
The use of teleradiology services has increased significantly, extending its reach into more remote areas of the country. This emerging field, however, faces numerous regulatory, financial, and technical challenges. The current teleradiology situation in India is a double-edged sword. Because of the growing population, there is an increasing demand for it, resulting in higher imaging volumes requiring radiologist services. The purpose of this editorial is to look at the current challenges in teleradiology in India, with a focus on the compensation model for teleradiologists, which has not kept up with the growing demand for services and is frequently inequitable.
Teleradiology’s introduction in India has been critical in extending radiology services to the country’s most remote corners . Increased imaging volumes and the need for specialized interpretations have driven up demand for radiology reporting services across the country. Technological advancements in the last decade have greatly expanded its scope, allowing the digital transmission of images from remote locations to teleradiologists anywhere in the country . This capability significantly improved the quality of care in these areas, particularly during and after the COVID-19 pandemic .
However, the business model underlying these teleradiology services has sparked considerable debate, particularly regarding radiologists trained in India interpreting scans from other countries. This practice has sparked an increase in teleradiology services, with work from abroad being outsourced to radiologists in India at nominal reimbursement rates . While this may initially be a profitable business model for teleradiology companies, it may not be entirely beneficial for radiologists whose pay remains low in comparison to their international counterparts . This could lead to teleradiologists interpreting an unusually large number of scans per shift. It may result in errors of omission and/or commission, lowering quality and negatively impacting patient outcomes.
While the expansion of teleradiology services undoubtedly improves healthcare outcomes in remote areas, maintaining the quality of radiological interpretations and attracting top talent to the field is critical . The trend of hiring radiologists in India to read international scans at lower reimbursement rates undermines this goal and can lead to job dissatisfaction, increased workloads, and burnout . The advantages of these technological advancements should ideally translate into better, more accessible, and less expensive healthcare for patients, as well as higher job satisfaction for radiologists.
The teleradiology setup provides significant benefits for radiologists, allowing them to work from home for multiple employers across India . However, despite the critical role that accurate and timely radiological reports play in patient care, teleradiologists in India are currently underpaid. These rates do not account for the time and effort required to correctly interpret radiology scans, nor do they take into account the extensive training and certification exams that these professionals must pass . Fresh residency graduates begin high-volume teleradiology jobs to supplement their income while working full-time. All of these factors may contribute to radiology’s perceived value as a profession among other clinicians. Many government and private hospitals have CT scanners, but there is a shortage of qualified and experienced radiologists. This may result in the publication of suboptimal images or images lacking critical clinical data, driven primarily by financial gain.
There is a significant disparity in payment models between Indian and foreign-trained radiologists, particularly when compared to Western-trained radiologists. An Indian radiologist specializing in cross-sectional imaging with five years of post-residency training would typically earn around 60,000 USD per year, while a similarly qualified radiologist in the United States would earn around 350,000 USD per year . Teleradiologists in India are frequently hired to provide preliminary reads for Western countries, but their pay is significantly lower than that of their Western counterparts for comparable services. The American College of Radiology (ACR) has questioned the ethical implications of this practice, but it continues . This practice may not only jeopardize the global reputation of Indian-trained radiologists, but it may also necessitate that they adjust their working hours to accommodate different time zones. When comparing the practice of teleradiology in India to that of the United States, teleradiology companies employing radiologists in India gain a significant advantage owing to the difference in time zones. A radiologist in India can report scans during the day, which corresponds to nighttime in the United States, potentially providing more effective reporting than a radiologist in the United States working during the night . While India has a lower cost of living than the United States, this should not be used to justify lower reimbursements. The demanding nature of radiological study interpretations, which requires intense work and judgment regardless of location, justifies equitable compensation.
The problem goes beyond international scans. The reimbursement model for radiologists in India is also suboptimal. National teleradiology providers may charge as little as INR 350–450 ($5–6) for interpreting a contrast CT or MRI exam, a complex task with significant implications for patient outcomes . Such practices can result in poorer patient outcomes, lower-quality interpretations, and radiologist burnout. It is even more critical now that the value of care and patient outcomes are at the heart of India’s newly launched Ayushman Bharat universal health coverage program, which will expand imaging services to a larger patient population .
The current trend of cost-cutting at the expense of radiologists is unsustainable, and it risks creating an unhappy teleradiology community. This could stifle innovation in teleradiology and slow its growth. It is critical to advance the specialty and provide long-term career opportunities for recent graduates. With the current low reimbursement rates, there is a real danger of failing to attract the best talent into radiology, which would severely impede the specialty’s growth. The rise of artificial intelligence (AI), cloud-based Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) systems, and other advancements demonstrate that teleradiology is not only the future but also a necessity . However, the intrinsic value of teleradiology as a specialty may have been diminished concurrently, with a greater emphasis placed on its viability as a business model rather than recognizing its critical role in maintaining high-quality reports to improve patient care. This is a significant disconnect because teleradiologists are frequently geographically distant from the patients they serve and have little direct interaction with the referring healthcare providers. As a result, it is up to radiologists to demonstrate their clinical expertise and contribute meaningfully to patient care.
Finally, the radiology community must band together to establish standardized reimbursement rates for teleradiologists that accurately reflect the value and effort involved in producing high-quality radiology reports. Recognizing that inadequate reimbursement is a major concern, organizations such as the Indian Radiological and Imaging Association (IRIA) have proposed fair market value compensation for teleradiologists . These recommendations, however, appear to be largely ignored. In the interest of job satisfaction and patient outcomes, the radiology community must band together to reject undervalued compensation.
Disclaimer: The WFY website aims to share experiences, opinions, and information on various topics. However, it is important to note that the author of this blog does not possess any professional authority or expertise, especially in subjects related to health, medical advice, or legal matters.
The information provided on this website is based on personal experiences, research, and general knowledge. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we cannot guarantee the completeness, reliability, or accuracy of the content. Therefore, any action you take based on the information found on this blog is at your own risk.
The contents of this blog should not be considered a substitute for professional advice or consultation from experts in the respective fields. If you require specific advice or assistance, we strongly recommend consulting with a qualified professional.
The WFY (website) and its author will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from the use or reliance on the information presented on this blog. It is your responsibility to verify any information obtained from this blog and to use it at your own discretion.
Please note that the opinions expressed in the articles and comments on this blog are those of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the website owner or any associated individuals.
By using this website, you acknowledge and agree to the above disclaimer. If you do not agree with this disclaimer, please refrain from using this website.
